Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Tragedy and our duty

During Yom Kippur a Jewish resident of nearby Somerville, Mitchell Heisman, committed suicide in Harvard Yard on the steps leading up to where the Reform services were taking place. I wrote a response to this tragic event for Boston's Jewish Advocate. The full text of the article follows:


The liturgy of Yom Kippur felt much more pronounced and real this year than perhaps in years past. As we stood and chanted “mi yihiyeh,” who shall live and “mi yamut,” who shall die, our minds could not help but turn to the tragedy that happened in our own back yard. Mitchell Heisman, a 35-year old Jewish Somerville resident, took his own life on the steps leading up to Harvard’s Memorial Church, the site of Harvard Hillel’s Reform Minyan Yom Kippur services. On a beautiful Saturday morning, as we proceeded through the rituals of Judaism’s most holy day, we were shaken from the beauty of the world around us, and a glimpse of human tragedy and suffering was revealed.

It is unclear from news reports how affiliated Mitchell was with the Jewish community. A quick glance through his 1900 page suicide note does reveal that he did view himself as a Jew and that this element of his identity played a seminal role in his formation. The question though of whether Mitchell was affiliated or not is a red herring.

The Torah in Deuteronomy 21 commands a peculiar ritual upon the discovery of an unidentified corpse near one’s city. The leaders of that city are meant to both declare their innocence in the person’s death and to ask forgiveness from G-d for the murder that occurred. How are both possible? If the community is innocent, why ask for forgiveness; and if the community is not innocent, why declare its innocence? The Torah teaches us that as a community we are collectively responsible for the welfare of those amongst us. We may be factually innocent from the death of that particular person, but that does not exonerate us from the collective responsibility; and we, as a Jewish community, must seize this moment and take stock of our preparedness.

Rabbi Dr. Abraham Twerski in his 1997 book “Getting Up When You’re Down” asks a fundamental question in his introduction: “What need is there for a book on depression in the Jewish family? Are there books on arthritis amongst Jews, or pneumonia among Jews?” The unfortunate reality is that mental illness, as Dr. Twerski explains, is “shrouded in a cloud of suspicion, secrecy and even shanda (shame).” This cloud obscures our ability to effectively reach out to those most in need. Perhaps the greatest tragedy is that the cloud is all too often only lifted once the suicide has happened.

The magazine of the Orthodox Union, Jewish Action, carried a groundbreaking article by Rabbi Nathaniel Helfgot in 2001, “Dimensions – A Young Man’s Story of Torment: Surviving Depression.” Rabbi Helfgot is a world renowned educator, author of several books and a public intellectual in the Modern Orthodox Jewish community. He went through a period of major depression in the ’90s and shared his story to help further open the Jewish community. He poignantly writes the following:

“Every few years, one reads in the newspaper of the frum boy who jumps off the George Washington Bridge or of the successful frum lawyer who shoots himself in the head, or the young adolescent yeshivah girl who runs away from home, never to be heard from again. And I sit and wonder, could these people have been helped before they reached the point of no return? Would they have felt less shame turning to someone if the community had created a culture where mental illness was not ‘someone’s fault’ or reflective of a personal flaw, but a disease to be treated and discussed in the same way and with the same empathy that one speaks of kidney disease, diabetes, and high blood pressure?”

We need to work tirelessly toward cultivating a greater atmosphere of loving concern and care amongst our community members. There is a fine line between gentle concern and “being nosy,” but simply being on the lookout for those who exist on the fringes of our community is a big step forward. Dr. Rosalynn Carter in her work “Helping Someone with Mental Illness” highlights several of the warning signs for mental illness, such as marked personality change; confused thinking; apathy; withdrawal from community; thinking or talking about suicide; or anger and hostility that is out of proportion to a situation. People exhibiting any or all of these symptoms need to be reached out to and proactively included in the community. Most importantly, they should not be kept a secret. Let a rabbi know what you have observed and hopefully a rabbi will be able to assist the person in finding a competent mental health practitioner.

The disorientation and shock we experienced on the tragic suicide of Mitchell Heisman should be the catalyst for a transformation in our communal perception of mental illness. The clouds that obscure our view of those most in need should be lifted, and those who exist on the fringes of our communities should be embraced with an open heart and open arms.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Covenantal Promise and Destiny: Wisdom for Life

I recently self-published a new book, Covenantal Promise and Destiny: Wisdom for Life. The book is the product of much reflection and study with students at Harvard Hillel on the books of Genesis and Deuteronomy.

I chose to focus in on those two books not only because they serve as the bookends for the Chumash but also because they form critical moments in the narrative arch of the Hebrew Bible. Within Genesis we uncover the greatest stories in human history; from God creating the world through the epic trials and tribulations of humanity and with it the process of narrowing unto one person and eventually unto one family to be the vehicle of holiness in this world. Deuteronomy is the greatest re-telling of the greatest storyline of the Jewish people by Moses, the greatest human leader. In every re-telling there is an act of interpretation and in that interpretation one can uncover great insights. When Genesis and Deuteronomy are studied together they reveal great wisdom that is directly applicable to our circumstances and to our time.

For those who decide to purchase my new book I hope it proves meaningful and worthwhile in aiding in your own development and in your study of Tanach and I look forward to hearing your comments. A book is not the end of a journey but rather one step along the way and I always appreciate feedback and reflections.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Shanah Tovah!

To all those who visit this blog wishing you a sweet new year filled with lots of Torah learning and deep engagement with Judaism! 

Shanah Tovah!

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Demystifying The Amnon Yitzhak Affair

Many may now be familiar with the well circulated video clip of a former Israeli singer receiving lashes (malkot) by a rabbinic court (Beit Din). The story had appeared in several news outlets including the Jerusalem Post and caused quite a stir amongst many people throughout the Jewish world. There are two aspects to this story that need to be clarified for people to truly understand what transpired.

First, there is the personality of Rav Amnon Yitzhak himself. Rav Yitzhak is a tremendous public figure in Israel who has dedicated his life to bringing Jews closer to halakhic observance through his Shofar organization. His typical events can draw anywhere from a few hundred to a few thousand people and that is because he utilizes outlandish skits and routines in order to simultaneously entertain while educate the crowds. The former singer who became the center of all this talk was not coerced into receiving lashes but rather he volunteered and asked for the treatment to assist him in achieving repentance. [It's another discussion altogether why performing for a mixed-gender audience should warrant such feelings of severe repentance.]

Second, one needs to understand the nature of these lashes. The lashes that were administered to this singer were essentially taps on his back and were entirely symbolic. The Beit Din did not severely beat him but rather gently struck him. The only sort of rabbinic court that can administer actual lashes is one comprised of rabbis possessing authentic ordination (semuchim) that was lost millenia ago through persecution. However, Jews have been using the instrument of honorary symbolic lashes for hundreds of years to serve as an impetus for repentance. This is especially true during the period of time between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. For example, the Shulchan Aruch in O"H 607:6 explicitly states that "All the congregation receives 40 [symbolic] lashes after the afternoon service [before Yom Kippur] because through this their heart will turn away from transgressions that are close to them." Both the Magen Avraham (9) and the Mishnah Berurah (18) are quick to point out that these are in no way obligatory nowadays nor do they serve to actually mitigate the need to do the work of repentance but they can serve as instruments towards that repentance.

Therefore, the request of that former singer to receive symbolic lashes was actually quite in line with rabbinic tradition as practiced for centuries. What was not quite in line with rabbinic tradition was the broadcasting of that moment over the Internet by the Israeli celebrity rabbi Amnon Yitzhak.

Whether we choose to follow this custom or not, may this season of introspection and reflection be a meaningful and transformational one.